Skip to content
Calling it out 8 min read · 19 Apr 2026

AI didn't make your agency quote more expensive. It just gave them new words.

The cost of delivering a good website fell dramatically between 2023 and 2026. The prices agencies quote didn't. Here's what happened, why, and the three questions that tell you if you're paying for real AI work or AI theatre.

Gary Cheers

Gary Cheers

Founder · Unf-ck

Cover image · placeholder

AI didn't make your agency quote more expensive. It just gave them new words.

The three-year stretch from early 2023 to now is the single largest productivity shift in digital delivery since mobile. What used to take a senior plus two juniors plus a project manager plus a QA pass now takes a senior plus AI. The cost of producing a good website, a good campaign, a good blog post, all of it collapsed.

You'd expect agency quotes to collapse too. They didn't. They went up.

The same site that cost £18,000 in 2022 now costs £24,000, and the agency pitch describes it as "AI-first, AI-augmented, AI-driven" as if those words justify the markup. Here's what's actually going on.

What AI actually changed in delivery cost

Component-level: a senior plus a good AI coding assistant now produces working code at roughly three to five times the rate they did alone. Design mock-ups that previously took a day can be iterated in an hour. Content drafting that took a junior a week takes a senior an afternoon to edit. Image optimisation, schema generation, redirect mapping, basic accessibility passes, copy polish, all of it became drastically cheaper to produce to the same standard.

The right response to this, from an agency acting in good faith, is to reduce prices. Or keep prices the same but deliver more. Or keep prices the same and deliver faster. Pick one.

Most didn't do any of those. They kept the old prices, raised them slightly, and added "AI-first" to the pitch deck. The efficiency gains went to agency margin, not to client value.

The "AI theatre" playbook

The agency that has actually integrated AI into delivery produces different outputs at different speeds. The agency that's doing AI theatre produces the same outputs at the same speed and charges more because the word "AI" is on the invoice. Here are the hallmarks.

  • The pitch deck has "AI" in the heading of every slide. Actual delivery has none of the process changes that real AI integration forces.
  • Timelines haven't shortened. Still three months for a 12-page site. Anybody using AI seriously can do it in three weeks.
  • Team size hasn't shrunk. Still eight people. AI reduces team size for delivery work. If it hasn't, nobody's actually using it.
  • Prices have gone up, not down. The productivity savings went to the agency. None to you.
  • "AI-generated content" on the statement of work. Means they bought an LLM subscription. Doesn't mean they've changed anything else.

What real AI-first delivery looks like

Faster. Cheaper. Smaller team. More throughput. If AI is actually in the stack, every one of those is true. Not some of them. All of them.

Real AI integration changes the whole shape of the engagement. You don't need three design rounds when you can generate eight variations in an afternoon. You don't need a content team of five when one senior editor can shape a dozen drafts per day. You don't need a QA analyst finding the same category of bug for the fiftieth time when automated checks catch it at commit.

This is reflected in what a real AI-first engagement quotes. For the same scope, expect 30–70% of the old industry price, delivered in 40–60% of the old timeline. Anything else is theatre.

Three questions to ask

  1. "How has your delivery team size changed in the last two years?" Honest answer is "smaller". If it's "the same" or "bigger", they haven't changed anything substantive.
  2. "What does your typical 10-page brochure site quote at, and how long does it take?" Answers under £8,000 and under four weeks, you're talking to someone who's genuinely moved with the market. Answers above that, you're paying for theatre and excuses.
  3. "Which specific AI tools are in your delivery pipeline, and what do they replace?" The agency that's using AI seriously will list three or four named tools, each tied to a specific role or artefact that used to take a human longer. The theatre agency will say "we use ChatGPT for content ideas".
The productivity gain of the AI era is real. The question is who gets it. In a well-functioning market, the buyer. In the current market, the agency. It doesn't have to stay that way.

What we do

Our delivery team is one senior plus AI. Our quotes have fallen in the last two years, not risen. Our timelines are in weeks, not months. A 20–50 page brochure site rebuilds for £1,500–£3,000 in 1–2 weeks. If that sounds impossibly low compared to what you've been quoted, that's the gap between real AI-first delivery and AI theatre.

Ask your current agency the three questions above. See what they say. Then decide what's fair.

Gary Cheers

Written by

Gary Cheers

Founder of Unf-ck. 30 years in digital. Writes here when there's something actually useful to say.

Enough reading?

Think yours is f-cked? send us the url.